Missouri Social Security Cases
Cases 241 - 250 of 8,505
Chrisenbery v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv00600
Plaintiff:
Iris Chrisenbery
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Keskeaw v. Kijakazi
as 5:2023cv06106
Plaintiff:
Debbie Keskeaw
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Bolek v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv00597
Plaintiff:
Donald Joseph Bolek
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Savage v. Kiljakazi
as 5:2023cv06105
Plaintiff:
Dale R. Savage
Defendant:
Kilolo Kiljakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Swiney v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv01058
Plaintiff:
Bethany Swiney
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
O'Neal v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00140
Plaintiff:
Jennifer O'Neal
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Swafford v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv01059
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Swafford
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jones v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv01056
Plaintiff:
Martikelia Jones
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Tritt v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv01041
Plaintiff:
Adam L Tritt and Adam L. Tritt
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Nolan v. Kijakazi
as 6:2023cv03264
Plaintiff:
Lonetta Lynn Nolan
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
