Missouri Social Security Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 8,509
Gibbons v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Ryan Gibbons
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Watts v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Ann Watts
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Wilson v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00399
Plaintiff:
Shelia Wilson
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Peth v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
Jason Peth
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Brown v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv06037
Plaintiff:
Katrina L Brown
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Dickens v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv04034
Plaintiff:
Cassey D. Dickens and Cassey Dwayne Dickens
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Carroll v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv05018
Plaintiff:
Candace Carroll
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Shumaker v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv05017
Plaintiff:
Donna Fay Shumaker
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Thomas v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00370
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Thomas
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Brooks v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00363
Plaintiff:
Bridget Brooks
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
