U.S. District Court for the District of Montana Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,404
Finley v. Ivanoff et al
as 9:2025cv00031
Plaintiff:
Daniel Felix Finley
Defendant:
Andy Ivanoff, Alex Beal, Missoula County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Karr v. NBC Universal Media, LLC
as 9:2025cv00033
Plaintiff:
Darren Karr
Defendant:
NBC Universal Media, LLC d/b/a NBC News
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2025cv00032
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2025cv00020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lucas v. Hillenbrand et al
as 2:2025cv00024
Plaintiff:
Gregory Lucas
Defendant:
Carly Hillenbrand, Susan Depasquale, Kara O'Connell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Vanwell v. Prairie County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2025cv00021
Plaintiff:
Logan Wayne Vanwell
Defendant:
Prairie County Sheriff's Office, Prairie Community Hospital, Prairie County Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Pham v. Smith et al
as 1:2025cv00020
Plaintiff:
Hoang Vinh Pham
Defendant:
Richard Smith, Department of Criminal Investigations, Brandon Kelm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wang v. AT&T et al
as 2:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
Hao Zhe Wang
Defendant:
AT&T and Snowflake Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brien v. United States of America
as 4:2025cv00012
Plaintiff:
Ben Brien
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Yost v. Acting Warden McNeil et al
as 6:2025cv00011
Plaintiff:
Jerry L. Yost
Defendant:
Acting Warden McNeil, Brian Gootkin and MSP High Side Unit Manager Cornelius
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
