US District Court for the District of Montana Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,322
Kolstad v. City of Glasgow et al
as 1:2023cv00147
Plaintiff:
Todd Kolstad
Defendant:
City of Glasgow, Valley County, Robert Weber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gates v. Ives et al
as 2:2023cv00089
Plaintiff:
Tyler Gates
Defendant:
Matt Ives and Richard Pasha
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00088
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hafner v. State of Montana et al
as 6:2023cv00082
Plaintiff:
Eric Hafner
Defendant:
State of Montana, Greg Gianforte and Austin Knudsen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Public Accomodations)
Azure v. United States of America et al
as 4:2023cv00081
Plaintiff:
Brandy Azure
Defendant:
United States of America, Jonah Riediger, Jim Summers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Hinman v. Attorney General et al
as 2:2023cv00087
Plaintiff:
Richard Denver Hinman
Defendant:
Attorney General and Greg Gianforte
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2023cv00145
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Gabriel v. Olsen
as 9:2023cv00142
Plaintiff:
Ryan D. Gabriel
Defendant:
Jesse Mark Olsen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Melvin v. Klambach et al
as 9:2023cv00140
Plaintiff:
Ronald P. Melvin
Defendant:
Justin Kalmbach and James Lapotka
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2023cv00139
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
