US District Court for the District of Nebraska Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 141 - 150 of 1,009
Nielsen v. Douglas Cty Prosecutor
as 8:2022cv00024
Petitioner:
Dustin L. Nielsen
Respondent:
Douglas Cty Prosecutor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Newman v. Frakes
as 8:2022cv00022
Petitioner:
Terrell Newman
Respondent:
Scot R. Frakes
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Freeman v. Douglas Cty Prosecutor
as 8:2022cv00021
Petitioner:
Micah Freeman
Respondent:
Douglas Cty Prosecutor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
James v. Frakes
as 8:2022cv00019
Petitioner:
Jamerio James and Ja'Mario James
Respondent:
Scott Frakes
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wiggins v. Omaha Police Dept.
as 8:2022cv00009
Petitioner:
Jerrold B. Wiggins
Respondent:
Omaha Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lee v. Boyd
as 8:2022cv00012
Petitioner:
Talon J. Lee
Respondent:
Taggart Boyd
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kyaw v. Nebraska
as 8:2022cv00007
Petitioner:
Tun Aung Kyaw
Respondent:
Nebraska
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Britt v. State of Nebraska
as 8:2021cv00474
Petitioner:
Timothy J. Britt
Respondent:
State of Nebraska
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tucker v. Myers
as 8:2021cv00475
Petitioner:
Kevin Tucker
Respondent:
Michael Myers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Wood v. Myers
as 8:2021cv00470
Petitioner:
Joseph Wood, Jr.
Respondent:
Michael Myers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.