US District Court for the District of New Jersey Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 73
SHAH v. JENNINGS et al
as 1:2024cv11105
Defendant:
TONY O. JENNINGS and ERNEST HALL
Plaintiff:
PARTH SHAH
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
LEITHER v. ORTHO SOLUTIONS, INC.
as 2:2024cv10317
Defendant:
ORTHO SOLUTIONS, INC.
Plaintiff:
ANDREW LEITHER
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
NAPRSTEK v. NEWREZ A/K/A SHELLPOINT MORTGAGE SERVICING
as 2:2024cv07832
Plaintiff:
LUBOS NAPRSTEK
Defendant:
NEWREZ A/K/A SHELLPOINT MORTGAGE SERVICING
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
COPELAND v. WILIMINGTON TRUST et al
as 3:2024cv04084
Plaintiff:
MAVEZ COPELAND and MARCIA COPELAND
Defendant:
WILIMINGTON TRUST, PHH MORTAGE, HONORABLE THOMAS D. MECLOSUM and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3731 Fraud
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. PATEL
as 2:2023cv21740
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Respondent:
DEVIKA PATEL
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
UNITED STATES v. MWW GROUP LLC
as 2:2023cv20757
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES
Respondent:
MWW GROUP LLC
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
NOORCHASHM v. BECTON, DICKINSON and COMPANY et al
as 2:2022cv07358
Plaintiff:
HOOMAN NOORCHASHM
Defendant:
BECTON, DICKINSON AND COMPANY, WILLIAM SIGMUND, JOHN DOES 1-10 (fictitiously named) and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730 Qui Tam False Claims Act
SEELHORST et al v. IMMUNOMEDICS, INC.
as 2:2022cv00098
Plaintiff:
Darryl Seelhorst, James Vigie and JAMES TAWN VIGIE
Defendant:
IMMUNOMEDICS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
STATE OF NEW JERSEY EX REL. KEN ELDER v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
as 2:2021cv19462
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY EX REL. KEN ELDER
Defendant:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
UNITED STATES v. KING
as 1:2021cv07321
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
JOHN D KING
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
