District Court Cases in New Jersey
Cases 111 - 120 of 228,257
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv07012
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06987
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv07004
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
MOQUETE-PEREZ v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv07006
Petitioner:
EVANGELISTA MOQUETE-PEREZ
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
AKINMADEYEMI v. WARDEN THOMPSON, FCI FORT DIX
as 1:2024cv07003
Petitioner:
AKINTOLA AKINMADEYEMI
Respondent:
WARDEN THOMPSON, FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
STEWART v. WARDEN THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv06917
Petitioner:
ROSHAWN STEWART
Respondent:
WARDEN THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
WILKINS v. DEGNER
as 1:2024cv06999
Plaintiff:
KHALIL WILKINS
Defendant:
ANTHONY DEGNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
OLIVETO v. LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
as 2:2024cv07009
Plaintiff:
TINA OLIVETO
Defendant:
LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
SANDRITTER v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv06995
Plaintiff:
DANIELLE SANDRITTER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
KEATING v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv07011
Plaintiff:
KATHLEEN H. KEATING
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
