US District Court for the District of New Mexico Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 4,360
Montano v. City of Albuquerque et al
as 1:2024cv00933
Plaintiff:
Leo Montano
Defendant:
Lawrence Monte, City of Albuquerque and Gustavo Gomez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Moore v. City of Las Cruces
as 2:2024cv00934
Defendant:
City of Las Cruces
Plaintiff:
Mance O Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Phillips
as 1:2024cv00922
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
FNU Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Quality is Our Recipe LLC
as 1:2024cv00923
Defendant:
Quality is Our Recipe LLC
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Robert J. Carter Trust
as 1:2024cv00913
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Robert J. Carter Trust
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Blanchard v. The City of Hobbs et al
as 2:2024cv00900
Defendant:
Lea County Board of County Commissioners and The City of Hobbs
Plaintiff:
Robert Blanchard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Kleinbrook v. Rio Rancho Police Dept. et al
as 1:2024cv00894
Plaintiff:
James Kleinbrook
Defendant:
Rio Rancho Police Dept. and University of New Mexico Medical Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Marion
as 1:2024cv00890
Defendant:
Alexander Marion
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alost v. Acosta
as 2:2024cv00893
Plaintiff:
Terence J Alost
Defendant:
Steven Acosta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
H v. Martinez et al
as 2:2024cv00887
Defendant:
County Commissioner Manuel A Sanchez, County Manager Fernando Macias, Michael Andrew Martinez and others
Plaintiff:
T H
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
