US District Court for the District of New Mexico Civil Rights Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 6,782
Pollak v. Strong et al
as 1:2024cv00494
Defendant:
Eyebabe, Second Judicial District Court of New Mexico, Lilli McKenzie and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Pollak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alabi v. Vilsack
as 1:2024cv00493
Defendant:
Tom Vilsack
Plaintiff:
Aliu Alabi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00497
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00488
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Sapp v. Greyhound Lines Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00466
Plaintiff:
Desiree Felicia Sapp
Defendant:
Mark Southerst, Jacob K Price, Western Trail Charters & Tours LLC doing business as Salt Lake Express ST George Express Aztec Shuttle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ortega et al v. Lujan Grisham et al
as 1:2024cv00471
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Scott and Samuel Ortega
Defendant:
Raul Torrez and Michelle Lujan Grisham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00463
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Hudson et al v. United States Forest Service et al
as 1:2024cv00456
Plaintiff:
Joel Shane Hudson and Rosanna Jane Hudson
Defendant:
United States Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
McBride v. Wolgomuth et al
as 1:2024cv00454
Plaintiff:
Treneeshia S. McBride
Defendant:
KL Wolgomuth and 1890 Woodruff Manifesto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
