New York Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 231 - 240 of 50,119
Banshu v. Haggler et al
as 1:2024cv03128
Plaintiff:
Kahusia J. Banshu
Defendant:
Sholomo S. Haggler, James Edward D'Auguste, Denis Michael Reo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mack v. Wolcott
as 1:2024cv00366
Petitioner:
Terrance Mack
Respondent:
Julie Wolcott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Castro v. Niagara County Correctional Facility et al
as 6:2024cv06235
Plaintiff:
Christian M. Castro
Defendant:
Niagara County Correctional Facility, Niagara County, Sgt. S. Paonessa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mazur v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv02963
Petitioner:
Michael Mazur
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
DeFreitas v. Kubetz et al
as 2:2024cv02918
Plaintiff:
Russell DeFreitas
Defendant:
Jacob Kubetz, Anthony Senft, Christopher Brocato and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02917
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02912
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Florance v. Broome County et al
as 9:2024cv00536
Plaintiff:
Thomas Florance
Defendant:
Broome County, Frederick J. Akshar, Robert Charpinsky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morinville v. Upstate Correctional Facility RRU et al
as 9:2024cv00531
Plaintiff:
Carlos Morinville
Defendant:
Upstate Correctional Facility RRU, Doe 1, Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Raniere v. USA
as 1:2024cv02925
Petitioner:
Keith Raniere
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
