US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 75
WOOD v. USA
as 1:2016cv01033
Plaintiff:
ETHEL THOMAS WOOD
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
REAVIS v. SSC WINSTON-SALEM OPERATING COMPANY LLC, ET AL
as 1:2016cv00571
Plaintiff:
BECKY DAVIS REAVIS
Defendant:
SSC WINSTON-SALEM OPERATING COMPANY LLC and NORTH CAROLINA HOLDCO, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GWALTNEY v. LITCHFORD et al
as 1:2016cv00426
Plaintiff:
RICHARD GWALTNEY
Defendant:
DAVID LITHFORD and JULIE UNKNOWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
CHAPMAN v. SSC CONCORD OPERATING COMPANY, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv00370
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY H CHAPMAN
Defendant:
SSC CONCORD OPERATING COMPANY, LLC and JONATHAN D. RICHARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILLIAMSON v. ROBERTS et al
as 1:2016cv00241
Plaintiff:
PENNY WILLIAMSON
Defendant:
SUSAN ROBERTS, NPC and OPTUM CLINICAL SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HILL v. FIRST HEALTH RICHMOND MEMORIAL HOSPITAL et al
as 1:2015cv00826
Plaintiff:
CHARLES ALFRED HILL
Defendant:
FIRST HEALTH RICHMOND MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, JOHN BRIDGMAN and TONYA MCCALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
GRIFFIN,ET AL., v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2015cv00812
Plaintiff:
MARILYN G. GRIFFIN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
THE ESTATE OF LLOYD JACK TRANTHAM, JR. V. LIVING CENTERS - SOUTHEAST, INC., ET AL.
as 1:2015cv00726
Defendant:
SSC LEXINGTON OPERATING COMPANY, LLC
Plaintiff:
THE ESTATE OF LLOYD JACK TRANTHAM, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ELSWORTH v. SSC ASHEBORO OPERATING COMPANY LLC D/B/A RANDOLPH HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER
as 1:2015cv00366
Defendant:
SSC ASHEBORO OPERATING COMPANY, LLC
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY ELSWORTH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WOOD et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2014cv01004
Plaintiff:
ETHEL THOMAS WOOD
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
