U.S. District Court for the Western District of North Carolina Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 3,345
MIL-COMM Products Company, Inc. v. Cohen et al
as 5:2025cv00038
Plaintiff:
MIL-COMM Products Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Gregory Cohen and Engineered Materials, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836 (b) Civil Action to Protect Trade Secrets
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv00188
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv00194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Cloer et al v. Caldwell County Court et al
as 5:2025cv00035
Plaintiff:
Barry E. Cloer and Debra C. Cloer
Defendant:
Caldwell County Court, Caldwell County Clerk of Court's Office, John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bohatikov v. Bohatikova
as 3:2025cv00182
Petitioner:
Oleksii Bohatikov
Respondent:
Yevheniia Bohatikova
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11601 Intl Child Abduction Remedies Act
Watt v. White
as 3:2025cv00181
Plaintiff:
Chester D. Watt
Defendant:
Keisha A. White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11601 Intl Child Abduction Remedies Act
Lytle v. Asheville Eye Associates, PLLC
as 1:2025cv00075
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Lytle
Defendant:
Asheville Eye Associates, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv00171
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Kargarian v. LNU
as 3:2025cv00174
Plaintiff:
Mohammad M. Kargarian
Defendant:
Steven LNU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv00165
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
