North Carolina Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,538
Sokolskyfilm, Inc. v. Vivant Media Group LLC
as 3:2024cv01045
Plaintiff:
Sokolskyfilm, Inc.
Defendant:
Vivant Media Group LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Sadowski v. Hannah, Inc. d/b/a Roadside Bar & Grill
as 2:2024cv00059
Defendant:
Hannah, Inc. d/b/a Roadside Bar & Grill
Plaintiff:
Christopher Sadowski
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. Burnt Barrel, LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00676
Plaintiff:
Sony/ATV Songs LLC doing business as Sony/ATV Tree Publishing, Arc Music Corp., Shelby Singleton Music, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Burnt Barrel, LLC doing business as Burnt Barrel and Amy Lynn Karlgut
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 5:2024cv00670
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 5:2024cv00671
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 7:2024cv01094
Defendant:
John Doe
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 7:2024cv01095
Defendant:
John Doe
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2024cv01031
Defendant:
John Doe and Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2024cv01032
Defendant:
John Doe
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2024cv01033
Defendant:
John Doe
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
