North Carolina Social Security Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 5,417
Hutton v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00256
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
US Attorney-Social Security Noticing and SSA Noticing
Plaintiff:
John Hutton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Edwards v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Dena Latifa Edwards
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Thornburg v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv01043
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Meredith Thornburg
Interested Party:
US Attorney-Social Security Noticing and SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
FULKS v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00995
Plaintiff:
JESSIE FULKS
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
WILSON v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00993
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Plaintiff:
TRACY WILSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Scott v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00659
Plaintiff:
Tonya Scott
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Webb v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00055
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Seanise N. Webb
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Laird v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00626
Plaintiff:
Michelle Laird
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Alexander v. O'Malley
as 7:2024cv01039
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Patricia Alexander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Roye v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00618
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Brendon Edward Roye
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
