North Carolina Social Security Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 4,259
LOOKABILL v. KING
as 1:2025cv00100
Plaintiff:
RANDY LOOKABILL
Defendant:
MICHELLE KING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
McGuinness v. King
as 4:2025cv00033
Plaintiff:
Nicole McGuinness
Defendant:
Michelle A. King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Moore v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2025cv00103
Plaintiff:
Christopher Moore
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and US Attorney- Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Scott v. King
as 5:2025cv00063
Plaintiff:
Godfrey Scott
Defendant:
Michelle King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Allbaugh v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2025cv00041
Plaintiff:
Charity Allbaugh
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and US Attorney-Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSDC)
Price v. King
as 5:2024cv00746
Plaintiff:
LAWANDA DENISA PRICE
Defendant:
Michelle A. King
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Franklin v. King
as 5:2025cv00017
Plaintiff:
Candace Franklin
Defendant:
Michelle A. King
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Bollten v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2025cv00076
Plaintiff:
Vera Bollten
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and US Attorney-Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Collier v. King
as 5:2025cv00045
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Collier
Defendant:
Michelle King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
SHOUSE v. COLVIN
as 1:2025cv00075
Plaintiff:
DAVID WAYNE SHOUSE
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
