North Carolina Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 634
Justice v. Endres et al
as 5:2024cv00389
Defendant:
Matthias Endres and Amy Bryant OBO Billys Plumbing Co, LLC
Plaintiff:
Bruce Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
SWEATT v. LYNCH et al
as 1:2024cv00526
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH NEIL SWEATT
Defendant:
BARRY LAVERN LYNCH and CHARLES INGRAM LUMBER CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Auto Negligence
Stevens v. Young et al
as 5:2024cv00346
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Stevens
Defendant:
Todd Vincent Young and Cactus Leasing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Wheless v. Bailey et al
as 5:2024cv00310
Plaintiff:
Rachel Tillery Wheless
Defendant:
Jud Lee Bailey and Tryon Trucking, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Anderson v. United States of America, et al
as 3:2024cv00516
Defendant:
Carlton Anderson, United States of America and Lisa Marie Groth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
FLOYD et al v. CAMPBELL et al
as 1:2024cv00400
Plaintiff:
Ashton Michelle Floyd and Stewart Floyd
Defendant:
Christopher Campbell and Nolan Logging & Chipping, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Crawford v. Avram
as 7:2024cv00407
Plaintiff:
Michael Philip Crawford
Defendant:
Romica Avram
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
EVANS v. THROCKMORTON et al
as 1:2024cv00357
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY SCOTT EVANS
Defendant:
LARRY MICHAEL THROCKMORTON and H&M LOGGING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
SEEGARS v. US GOVERNMENT
as 1:2024cv00344
Plaintiff:
HERBERT CHARLES SEEGARS
Defendant:
US GOVERNMENT and U.S. GOVERNMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Moore v. Coleman et al
as 4:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Kimberley Moore
Defendant:
Walter Alexander Coleman and Logistics Solutions Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
