US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 211 - 220 of 10,416
Cason v. USA
as 1:2023cv02161
Petitioner:
Tywon D. Cason
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Nycklass v. Healy
as 4:2023cv02166
Petitioner:
Windsor Nycklass
Respondent:
Warden I. Healy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lettieri v. Federal Marshals
as 4:2023cv02167
Plaintiff:
David C. Lettieri
Defendant:
Federal Marshals
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
St. Thomas v. State of Ohio et al.
as 4:2023cv02168
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Howard St. Thomas
Defendant:
State of Ohio, Scott D. Hunter, Kenneth Cardinal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Redwood et al.
as 1:2023cv02154
Plaintiff:
David Smith and David M. Smith
Defendant:
D. Redwood, J. Byner, Warden Jennifer Black and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Orozco v. Healy
as 4:2023cv02151
Petitioner:
Jorge Orozco and Garlobo Orozco
Respondent:
Warden I. Healy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Easterling v. Mahoning County et al.
as 4:2023cv02140
Plaintiff:
Rean Easterling
Defendant:
Mahoning County, Trinity Correctional Food Services, Sheriff Jerry Greene and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stradford v. U.S. Bank
as 1:2023cv02135
Plaintiff:
LeShawn Stradford
Defendant:
U.S. Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Chambers v. County of Mahoning et al.
as 4:2023cv02136
Plaintiff:
Brandon Chambers
Defendant:
County of Mahoning, Commissioner D. Dipzler, Commissioner C. Rimedio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lucarell v. USA
as 4:2023cv02137
Petitioner:
Matthew Lucarell
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
