US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 261 - 270 of 10,449
Brooks v. Forshey
as 1:2023cv02123
Petitioner:
Demondray Brooks
Respondent:
Warden Jay Forshey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sanniti v. City of Cleveland, Ohio et al.
as 1:2023cv02118
Plaintiff:
Steven Sanniti
Defendant:
City of Cleveland, Ohio and Cleveland Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Ranes v. Wattson
as 3:2023cv02112
Petitioner:
David Ranes
Respondent:
Warden Thomas Wattson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
King III v. Souders et al.
as 1:2023cv02089
Plaintiff:
Roy King III
Defendant:
Amanda Souders, Greg Frankart, Jason Flick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rones v. Summit County Sheriff
as 5:2023cv02086
Petitioner:
Murry Rones
Respondent:
Summit County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. City of Toledo et al.
as 3:2023cv02084
Plaintiff:
Joel Brown
Defendant:
City of Toledo, Officer Darnell Boles and Officer John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Weiss v. Healy
as 4:2023cv02074
Petitioner:
Arthur Sandford Weiss
Respondent:
I. Healy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Daniels v. County of Mahoning et al.
as 4:2023cv02076
Plaintiff:
Charles Daniels
Defendant:
County of Mahoning, Mahoning County Justice Center, Sheriff Jerry Greene and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lettieri v. New York State Troopers
as 4:2023cv02077
Plaintiff:
David C. Lettieri
Defendant:
New York State Troopers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Silver v. Cuyahoga County
as 1:2023cv02070
Plaintiff:
Terrell L. Silver
Defendant:
Cuyahoga County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
