US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio Forfeiture / Penalty Cases

Other Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 114
Damstoft v. United States Congress et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00906
Plaintiff: Leif P. Damstoft
Defendant: United States Congress and United States Senate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
United States of America v. 15 Pit Bull-Type Dogs presently in the custody of the United States Marshals Service et al
as 5:2022cv01358
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: 15 Pit Bull-Type Dogs presently in the custody of the United States Marshals Service, Rabbit presently in the custody of the United States through the Summit County Humane Society and All Offspring of the 15 Pit Bull-Type dogs and rabbit; including, but not limited to, four (4) puppies
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341 Complaint for Forfeiture
United States v. Check for $19,051
as 3:2022cv01323
Petitioner: United States
Defendant: Check for $19,051.00 from Remaining Value on Group of Nine VISA Bank of America Cards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341 Complaint for Forfeiture
Poulos v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 5:2022cv01326
Plaintiff: Larry Poulos
Defendant: United States Department of Justice, Heather Bradley, Ethan Commons Homeowners Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
United States of America v. $14,130.00 in U.S. Currency
as 1:2022cv01222
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: $14,130.00 in U.S. Currency
Interested Party: Trequile Burkett
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
DG Auto Parts LLC, et al v. US Dept. of Homeland Security
as 3:2022cv00186
Plaintiff: DG AUTO PARTS, LLC and justin carnevale
Defendant: United States of America, U.S. Department of Homeland Security U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
United States of America v. $582,932.89 in Funds seized on October 7, 2021, from Farmers National Bank Account No. xxxx9874, Pursuant to the execution of a Federal Seizure Warrant et al
as 4:2022cv00057
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: $582,932.89 in Funds seized on October 7, 2021, from Farmers National Bank Account No. xxxx9874, Pursuant to the execution of a Federal Seizure Warrant, $14,971.75 in Funds seized on October 7, 2021, from farmers National Bank Account No. xxxx9885, Pursuant to the execution of a Federal Seizure Warrant, $2,959.22 in funds seized on October 7, 2021, from Farmers National Bank Account No. xxxx0435, Pursuant to the Execution of a Federal Seizure Warrant and others
Interested Party: Sebastian Rucci and Margaret Nelson
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. $10,395.00 in U.S. Currency seized on July 8, 2021, Pursuant to the Execution of a Federal Search Warrant
as 1:2021cv02220
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: $10,395.00 in U.S. Currency seized on July 8, 2021, Pursuant to the Execution of a Federal Search Warrant
Interested Party: Courtney Brown
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. 252,640 Counterfeit 3M Branded Model 1860-S Respirators/Masks - Sold to the Cleveland Clinic by Q2 Solutions et al
as 1:2021cv01660
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: 252,640 Counterfeit 3M Branded Model 1860-S Respirators/Masks - Sold to the Cleveland Clinic by Q2 Solutions and 94,000 Counterfeit 3M Branded Model 1860 Respirators/Masks - Sold to the Cleveland Clinic by Q2 Solutions
Claimant: Q2 Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341
United States of America v. $80,314.96 Seized on April 27, 2021, et al
as 1:2021cv01628
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: $80,314.96 Seized on April 27, 2021, $212,567.14 Seized on April 27, 2021 and $498,978.00 Seized on April 27, 2021
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?