US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Real Property Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 1,666
Wilson-Sidguy v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03176
Plaintiff:
Karen Wilson-Sidguy
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Vaughn v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03164
Plaintiff:
Kellie Vaughn
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sumner v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03154
Plaintiff:
Coby Sumner
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Younger v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03179
Plaintiff:
Denese Younger
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Walker v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03166
Plaintiff:
Linda Walker
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wunderlich v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03178
Plaintiff:
Gary Wunderlich
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sumner v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03155
Plaintiff:
Esom Sumner
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Starnes v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03152
Plaintiff:
Jamie Starnes
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ward v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03167
Plaintiff:
Leonard Ward
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Vaculik v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03162
Plaintiff:
Steven Vaculik
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
