U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Real Property Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 1,680
Vaculik v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03162
Plaintiff:
Steven Vaculik
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Towns v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03159
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jurrel Towns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wiseley v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03177
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jim Wiseley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Turner v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03161
Plaintiff:
Ceola Turner
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wiggen v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03171
Plaintiff:
Mahala Wiggen
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wilford v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03172
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Janelle Wilford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Starnes v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03152
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jamie Starnes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Torres v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03158
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Sergio Torres
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Younger v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03179
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Denese Younger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wilson-Sidguy v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03176
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Karen Wilson-Sidguy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
