US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Real Property Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 1,674
Younger v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03179
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Denese Younger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wilson-Sidguy v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03176
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Karen Wilson-Sidguy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wilkinson v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03173
Plaintiff:
Daniel Wilkinson
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Williams v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03175
Plaintiff:
Nicole Williams
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sumner v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03154
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Coby Sumner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Watkins v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03168
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Johnas Watkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Vencill v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03165
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Robert Vencill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stamper v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03151
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Regina Stamper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Walker v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03166
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Linda Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Swearingen v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03156
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Wesley Swearingen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.