U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Real Property Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 1,676
Quinn v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03100
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Montie Quinn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pidde v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03091
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Eugene Pidde
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sanders v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03104
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Donald Sanders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pena v. C.R. Bard Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03080
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard Inc.
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Pena
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sparrow v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03112
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
David Sparrow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pruitt v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03097
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Ernest Pruitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plambeck v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03093
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Arthur Plambeck
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Purdon v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03099
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
James C. Purdon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pierre-Fergurson v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03092
Plaintiff:
Mary Pierre-Fergurson
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rivera v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03101
Plaintiff:
Louis Rivera
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.