US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Torts - Injury Cases

Personal Injury- Product Liability Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 5,852
Boyd v. Mick et al
as 2:2022cv03492
Plaintiff: John A Boyd
Defendant: Kimberly Mick and Aramark Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kundrat v. Davol, Inc., et al.
as 2:2022cv03472
Plaintiff: Kathleen Kundrat
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R Bard Inc
Lucas v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv03473
Plaintiff: Debra D. Lucas
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kazeem v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv03474
Plaintiff: Melissa Kazeem
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R Bard Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Desautel v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv03475
Plaintiff: Denise Desautel
Defendant: Davol Inc and C.R Bard Inc
Barnett et al v. The Kroger Company et al
as 1:2022cv00544
Plaintiff: Tasheba Barnett, Adele Hoffman and Chadaela Lovincey
Defendant: The Kroger Company d/b/a Simple Truth Organic, Harris Teeter, LLC, Harris Teeter Supermarkets, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kania v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv03469
Plaintiff: Tommi Kania
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Woten v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv03447
Plaintiff: Shana Y. Woten
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Campbell v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv03414
Defendant: Bard Davol, Inc.
Claimant: Amanda Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Fitchie v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv03418
Plaintiff: Thomas Fitchie
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?