US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 6,921
Struck v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02252
Plaintiff:
Fran Struck
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Alston v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02244
Plaintiff:
Edna Alston
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Schneider v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02205
Plaintiff:
Timothy Schneider
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Clark v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02208
Plaintiff:
Chester Clark
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mizell v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02136
Plaintiff:
Carol L. Mizell
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pellerin v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02138
Plaintiff:
Susan M. Pellerin
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Abualhaija v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02070
Plaintiff:
Nashat Abualhaija
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Allen v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02061
Plaintiff:
Richard Lawrence Allen, Jr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Snow v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02049
Plaintiff:
Joyce A. Snow
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jindal v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02050
Plaintiff:
Hitesh Jindal
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
