US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 6,887
Thomas et al v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company et al
as 2:2024cv01897
Plaintiff:
Bobby Thomas and Lana Thomas
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company and The Chemours Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Bonilla v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01896
Plaintiff:
Estevan Bonilla
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johns v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01902
Plaintiff:
Amy Johns
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rodriguez v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01903
Plaintiff:
Enrique Rodriguez
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sederburg v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01857
Plaintiff:
Mary Sederburg
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Marshall v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01873
Plaintiff:
Tammy Marshall
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Giddings v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01880
Plaintiff:
Donald Giddings
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ogle v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01871
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Ogle
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Curtis v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01851
Plaintiff:
Ray Curtis
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Eckersley v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01877
Plaintiff:
Herbie Eckersley
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
