US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 131 - 140 of 31,019
Schneider v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02205
Plaintiff:
Timothy Schneider
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lindsley v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02197
Plaintiff:
Chasity Lindsley
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McCracken v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02200
Plaintiff:
William McCracken
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McGill v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02202
Plaintiff:
Candi McGill
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Najarantousi v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02206
Plaintiff:
Saeed Najarantousi
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dere v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02215
Plaintiff:
Wayne Dere
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ungren v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02219
Plaintiff:
Ruth Ungren
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Williams v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02223
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Williams
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cornelison v. C.R. Bard, Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02225
Plaintiff:
Michael D Cornelison
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc and Davol, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Clark v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02208
Plaintiff:
Chester Clark
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
