US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Cases 121 - 130 of 81,624
Boards of Trustees of the Ohio Laborers Benefits v. Foill, Inc.
as 2:2024cv03040
Plaintiff:
Boards of Trustees of the Ohio Laborers Benefits
Defendant:
Foill, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 2:2024cv03034
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Pasqualone v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv03038
Plaintiff:
Kathy L. Pasqualone
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00304
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Zwiefelhofer v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03029
Plaintiff:
Neal Zwiefelhofer
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gillmore v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03031
Plaintiff:
Debra Gillmore
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Lampkins v. Center of Science and Industry (COSI)
as 2:2024cv03026
Plaintiff:
Bradley D. Lampkins
Defendant:
Center of Science and Industry (COSI)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 2:2024cv03035
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 2:2024cv03033
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
