US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Cases 61 - 70 of 80,463
Burns et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02031
Plaintiff:
Tim Burns and Mary Burns
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kyser et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02036
Plaintiff:
Darlene Kyser and Bobby Kyser
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Danas v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02034
Plaintiff:
David Danas
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Vance, Jr. v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02037
Plaintiff:
Alvin Vance, Jr.
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Marquez v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02038
Plaintiff:
Ramiro Marquez
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Redman v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02043
Plaintiff:
David Redman
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ballis v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02042
Plaintiff:
William Ballis
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gomez v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02039
Plaintiff:
Oscar Gomez
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Fikes v. Warden, Marion Correctional Institution
as 1:2024cv00237
Petitioner:
Joshua Fikes
Respondent:
Warden, Marion Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
