Ohio Torts - Property Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 2,018
Page v. GameStop Corporation
as 5:2023cv01970
Plaintiff:
Ryan Page
Defendant:
GameStop Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Sanders v. Smith Unlimited, LLC.
as 5:2023cv01921
Plaintiff:
J.C. Sanders
Defendant:
Smith Unlimited, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Skinner v. Bath & Body Works, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03226
Plaintiff:
Christopher Skinner
Defendant:
Bath & Body Works, Inc., Bath & Body Works, LLC and Bath & Body Works Direct, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hudson v. Cornwell Quality Tools Company
as 1:2023cv01887
Plaintiff:
William Hudson
Defendant:
Cornwell Quality Tools Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
DOT Foods, Inc. et al. v. Shama Express LLC
as 1:2023cv01894
Plaintiff:
DOT Foods, Inc. and Zurich American Insurance Company
Defendant:
Shama Express LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Barefoot v. Peoples Bank
as 2:2023cv03161
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Barefoot
Defendant:
Peoples Bank doing business as Limestone Bank, Peoples Bank and Limestone Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
McDonald v. Peoples Bank
as 2:2023cv03084
Plaintiff:
Stephen McDonald
Defendant:
Peoples Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Bury v. Paez et al.
as 4:2023cv01859
Plaintiff:
Scott Bury
Defendant:
Leonardo E. Herrera Paez and Hogan Dedicated Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
The Federal Savings Bank v. Lower, LLC
as 2:2023cv03040
Plaintiff:
The Federal Savings Bank
Defendant:
Lower, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Brooks et al v. Peoples Bank
as 2:2023cv03043
Plaintiff:
Latasha Brooks and Michael Brooks
Defendant:
Peoples Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
