US District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma Civil Rights Cases
Cases 181 - 190 of 1,456
Blackmon v. State of Oklahoma
as 6:2021cv00124
Defendant:
Saundra Blackmon
Plaintiff:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hetherington v. Edwards et al
as 6:2021cv00121
Plaintiff:
Maria Hetherington
Defendant:
Does 1-10, Health & Wellness Center, Inc. and Donald Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Webster et al v. Garland et al
as 6:2021cv00119
Plaintiff:
Paul Leroy Wickham, Dwayne Marvin Garrett and Shirley Dione Webster
Defendant:
Jim Felte, Christopher Wray, Claire V. Eagan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv00104
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv00100
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Horrell v. Chennault et al
as 6:2021cv00096
Defendant:
Does 1-5, John Doe and Jason Chennault
Plaintiff:
Michael Horrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rahhal v. U.S. Jew Law Infore - Okemah
as 6:2021cv00086
Defendant:
U.S. Jew Law Infore - Okemah
Plaintiff:
Birdella Love Rahhal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Martinez et al v. Sequoyah County Criminal Justice Authority et al
as 6:2021cv00084
Defendant:
Board of County Commissioners of Sequoyah County, Oklahoma, Turn Key Health Clinics, LLC, Julie Ninal and others
Plaintiff:
Francisca N. Martinez, Frankie Sawney, Angelo Sawney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woolley v. Elliott et al
as 6:2021cv00069
Defendant:
Danny Elliott, Chris Elliott, Meagan Sinclair and others
Plaintiff:
Glory Rachelle Woolley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv00068
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
