US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 131 - 140 of 1,180
McCarty v. Nunn
as 4:2022cv00181
Petitioner: Jonathan Dale McCarty
Respondent: Scott Nunn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
January v. Dennis
as 4:2022cv00165
Petitioner: Phillip Earl January
Respondent: Chad Dennis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anderson v. Nunn
as 4:2022cv00150
Petitioner: Christopher A Anderson
Respondent: Scott Nunn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vineyard v. Nunn
as 4:2022cv00149
Petitioner: Alfonzo L Vineyard
Respondent: Scott Nunn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Frierson v. Crow We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv00141
Petitioner: Kendrick D Frierson
Respondent: Scott Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Nunn We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv00137
Petitioner: Brian John Smith
Respondent: Scott Nunn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tafolla v. Farris
as 4:2022cv00140
Petitioner: Jestin Tafolla and Bebo
Respondent: Jim Farris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garrison v. Parker
as 4:2022cv00130
Petitioner: Matthew Len Garrison
Respondent: David Parker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vue v. Dowling We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv00125
Plaintiff: Ong Vue
Defendant: Janet Dowling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Chaffee v. Dean
as 4:2022cv00116
Petitioner: David WW Chaffee
Defendant: David Dean
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?