US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 91 - 100 of 1,179
July v. Dowling
as 4:2022cv00393
Petitioner: George Emile July
Respondent: Janet Dowling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. Bridges
as 4:2022cv00372
Petitioner: Tommy W Scott
Respondent: Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wanjiku v. Hearrell
as 4:2022cv00368
Petitioner: Erick Wanjiku
Respondent: Angela Hearrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carter v. Hearrell We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv00349
Petitioner: Erice Ramone Carter
Respondent: Angela Hearrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Henson v. Rankins
as 4:2022cv00348
Petitioner: Anthony B Henson, Sr
Respondent: Chris Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sumpter v. Dowling
as 4:2022cv00343
Petitioner: Keith Sumpter and Keith Lorenzo Sumpter
Respondent: Janet Dowling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Green v State of Oklahoma
as 4:2022cv00344
Petitioner: Steve Oneal Green
Respondent: State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parker v Bridges
as 4:2022cv00340
Petitioner: Michael Gary Parker, Jr
Respondent: Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clark v Crow
as 4:2022cv00334
Defendant: David George Clark and Scott Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Franks v. Clayton We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv00328
Petitioner: Avery Lloyd Franks
Respondent: Deon Clayton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?