US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 1,179
Bradford v. Farris
as 4:2022cv00458
Petitioner:
Eric Tyrone Bradford
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma and Jim Farris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Diaz v. Crow
as 4:2022cv00457
Petitioner:
Jose Manuel Diaz
Respondent:
Scott Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Caudle v. State of Oklahoma, The
as 4:2022cv00453
Petitioner:
Zachary Caudle
Respondent:
Tanya Wilson, Clifford Smith and State of Oklahoma, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hamilton v. Crow
as 4:2022cv00434
Petitioner:
Anthony Emmett Hamilton, Jr
Respondent:
Scott Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Worthington v. Whitten
as 4:2022cv00429
Petitioner:
David Paul Worthington
Respondent:
Rick Whitten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Collins v. Bridges
as 4:2022cv00422
Petitioner:
Larry Jonathan Collins
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Blanchard v. Oklahoma State
as 4:2022cv00424
Petitioner:
James Robert Blanchard
Respondent:
Oklahoma State
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mooney v. Crow
as 4:2022cv00415
Petitioner:
Joshua Scott Mooney
Respondent:
Scott Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nordstedt v. Louthan
as 4:2022cv00414
Petitioner:
Brandon W Nordstedt
Respondent:
David Louthan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Patillar v. Warden
as 4:2022cv00407
Petitioner:
Calvin Patillar
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
