US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 607
Davis v. Snyder, et al
as 4:2022cv00152
Plaintiff:
Mr. Richard Davis and Mr Richard Davis
Defendant:
Michael Snyder and Max Ryden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Benson v. Kunzweiler et al
as 4:2022cv00153
Plaintiff:
Mr. David Lee Benson and David Lee Benson
Defendant:
Steve Kunzweiler, Kenneth Allan Filmore, Tanya Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Melcher v. Huber et al
as 4:2022cv00128
Plaintiff:
Devin Lee Melcher
Defendant:
James Huber and Mark Collier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dirichson v. Muscogee (Creek) Nation et al
as 4:2022cv00016
Plaintiff:
Brandon Dean Dirichson and Brandon Dean Dirickson
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, Owasson Police Dept., Officer Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grayson v. Buchanon et al
as 4:2022cv00017
Plaintiff:
Robert W Grayson, Jr
Defendant:
Kevin Buchanon, Will Drake, Linda Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Webster v. Greenough et al
as 4:2022cv00010
Plaintiff:
James Marvin Webster
Defendant:
Kelly Greenough, Michelle Keely, Ashley Nix and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Delaney v. City of Tulsa, Oklahoma et al
as 4:2021cv00544
Plaintiff:
Michael Delaney
Defendant:
City of Tulsa, Oklahoma and Aaron Russell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Talbert v. James
as 4:2021cv00522
Plaintiff:
Hillary Talbert, IV
Defendant:
Johnnie James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stith v. State of Oklahoma
as 4:2021cv00520
Petitioner:
Derrick Wayne Stith, Sr
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnett v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 4:2021cv00487
Plaintiff:
Calvin Eugene Barnett
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, Stephen A Kunzweiler, Kevin Keller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
