US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 300
Kristich v. United States of America et al
as 5:2023cv00544
Plaintiff:
Orin Kristich
Defendant:
United States of America, Bureau of Prisons, FNU Dickerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rean v. LNU
as 5:2023cv00537
Petitioner:
Rusty Rex Rean
Respondent:
FNU LNU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Barlean v. Oklahoma County Criminal Justice Authority et al
as 5:2023cv00488
Plaintiff:
Kelly J Barlean
Defendant:
Oklahoma County Criminal Justice Authority, Turn Key Health Clinics LLC, Jesse Childers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bates v. Sheriff of Cleveland County Oklahoma et al
as 5:2023cv00421
Plaintiff:
Roland Keith Bates
Defendant:
Sheriff of Cleveland County Oklahoma, Turn Key Health Clinics LLC, Red Rock Behavioral Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Graham v. Lankford
as 5:2023cv00407
Plaintiff:
Chandra Graham
Defendant:
James Paul Lankford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Graham v. Williams
as 5:2023cv00405
Plaintiff:
Chandra Graham
Defendant:
Misty Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graham v. Henderson
as 5:2023cv00402
Plaintiff:
Chandra Graham
Defendant:
Michelle Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graham v. Irvin
as 5:2023cv00395
Plaintiff:
Chandra Graham
Defendant:
Alicia Irvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00398
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Graham v. Hanes
as 5:2023cv00396
Plaintiff:
Chandra Graham
Defendant:
Michael Hanes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
