Oklahoma Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 306
Itasca Images, LLC v. PennWell Corporation et al
as 4:2021cv00164
Defendant:
PennWell Corporation, Clarion Events Ltd. and Clarion Events, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Attorney Gerald L Jackson and Itasca Images, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Mahadevan v. Kelkar et al
as 4:2021cv00053
Defendant:
Mohan Kelkar, Winona Tanaka, University of Tulsa and others
Plaintiff:
Jagan Mahadevan
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Mango v. PennWell Corporation
as 4:2020cv00587
Plaintiff:
Gregory Mango
Defendant:
PennWell Corporation
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Whyte Monkee Productions LLC et al v. Netflix INC
as 5:2020cv00933
Plaintiff:
Whyte Monkee Productions LLC and Timothy Sepi
Defendant:
Netflix INC and Royal Goode Productions LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Tomelleri v. Big Carp Tackle, LLC
as 4:2020cv00382
Defendant:
Big Carp Tackle, LLC
Plaintiff:
Joseph R Tomelleri
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Joe Hand Promotions Inc v. McClinton et al
as 5:2020cv00748
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions Inc
Defendant:
Session Hookah Lounge Inc doing business as Session Hookah Lounge and Victor J McClinton, Jr individually, and as an officer, director, shareholder, member and/or principal of Session Hookah Lounge, Inc. d/b/a Session Hookah Lounge
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Tejada v. CSI Measurement, LLC
as 5:2020cv00324
Plaintiff:
David Tejada
Defendant:
CSI Measurement, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Tejada v. CSI Measurement, LLC
as 4:2020cv00143
Plaintiff:
David Tejada
Defendant:
CSI Measurement, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Johnson v. Amazon.Com Inc et al
as 5:2020cv00223
Plaintiff:
Nakia Johnson
Defendant:
Ebay Inc and Amazon.Com Inc
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Seidman v. Pennwell Corporation
as 4:2020cv00097
Defendant:
Pennwell Corporation
Plaintiff:
Helayne Seidman
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
