Oklahoma Labor Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 143
Riley v. The GoodYear Tire and Rubber Company
as 5:2022cv00357
Plaintiff:
Tasha Riley
Defendant:
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company The
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Pursuant to the Family Leave Act
Coker v. SSM Health Bone and Joint et al
as 5:2022cv00311
Plaintiff:
Sarah Coker
Defendant:
SSM Health Bone and Joint, St Anthonys Hospital and Cheryl McConnell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Allen v. Clean Uniform Co
as 5:2022cv00244
Plaintiff:
George Allen
Defendant:
Clean Uniform Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Six v. American Fidelity Corporation
as 5:2022cv00175
Plaintiff:
Brianne Six
Defendant:
American Fidelity Corporation and American Fidelity Assurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Pursuant to the Family Leave Act
Herrington v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 4:2021cv00505
Plaintiff:
Cliff Herrington
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP d/b/a Wal-Mart, a foreign limited partnership - Wal-Mart
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Child v. American Electric Power Service Corporation
as 4:2021cv00497
Plaintiff:
Aaron Child
Defendant:
American Electric Power Service Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Rodriguez v. Creek County Emergency Ambulance Service
as 4:2021cv00489
Plaintiff:
Lacey Rodriguez
Defendant:
Creek County Emergency Ambulance Service
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Hammond v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2021cv00339
Plaintiff:
Mattie Hammond
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections, Daniel Faulk, Randy Moran and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Johnson v. L3Harris Technologies, Inc.
as 4:2021cv00326
Plaintiff:
Marcus Johnson
Defendant:
L3 Harris Technologies, Inc. and L3Harris Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Moore v. Connexions Loyalty Acquisitions LLC
as 4:2021cv00318
Plaintiff:
Lakeiia Moore
Defendant:
Connexions Loyalty Acquisition LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
