Oregon Civil Rights Cases
Cases 121 - 130 of 7,551
King et al v. Hanson et al
as 3:2024cv00152
Plaintiff:
Sarah King, Godspeed Hollow Farm, Christine Anderson and others
Defendant:
Lisa Charpilloz Hanson and Wym Matthews
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hughes Faulk v. US District Court
as 3:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
Michelle L. Hughes Faulk
Defendant:
US District Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00144
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Ocegueda et al v. Polk County et al
as 3:2024cv00125
Plaintiff:
Ivan Ocegueda, Estate Isaac ocegueda and Yuleni zavala
Defendant:
Polk County, Sheriff Mark Garton and Deputy Michael Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Hughes Faulk v. Washington County Circuit Court et al
as 3:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
Michelle L. Hughes Faulk
Defendant:
Washington County Circuit Court and State of Oregon Judicial Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
