Oregon Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 141 - 150 of 3,376
Newell v. Jacquez
as 3:2023cv01754
Petitioner:
Randal Jason Newell
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Sanchez-Diaz v. Miller
as 2:2023cv01725
Petitioner:
Efrain Sanchez-Diaz
Respondent:
Jamie Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Steward v. Sundquist
as 3:2023cv01729
Petitioner:
Robert Lee Steward
Respondent:
Amber Sundquist
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gastelum-Medina v. Cain
as 2:2023cv01713
Petitioner:
Roger Gastelum-Medina
Respondent:
Brad Cain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Santarelli v. Multnomah County Circuit Court
as 3:2023cv01677
Petitioner:
Stella A. Santarelli
Respondent:
Multnomah County Circuit Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Purcell v. Miller
as 2:2023cv01658
Petitioner:
Christopher David Purcell
Respondent:
Jaimie Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wright v. State of Oregon
as 6:2023cv01581
Petitioner:
Beverly June Wright
Respondent:
State of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tindall-Martin v. Reyes
as 2:2023cv01566
Petitioner:
Jayson Andrew Tindall-Martin
Respondent:
Erin Reyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tulio et al v. Sickler
as 1:2023cv01533
Petitioner:
Dylan Scott Tulio and Marco Navarrete
Respondent:
Nathan Sickler and State of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cunningham v. Fhuere
as 6:2023cv01492
Petitioner:
Bradly M. Cunningham
Respondent:
Corey Fhuere
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
