US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 3,302
BRYANT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2023cv04494
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. BRYANT
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MERRICK GARLAND, CRAWFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IN RE: CHRISTOPHER OLIVER
as 5:2023cv04385
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER OLIVER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRISON-EL v. 1 JOHN DOE OFFICER et al
as 2:2023cv04364
Plaintiff:
ALI A. HARRISON-EL
Defendant:
1 JOHN DOE OFFICER, OFFICER TANNER and FALLS TOWNSHIP P.D.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DUBOSE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv04374
Plaintiff:
ZUMAR H. DUBOSE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
CHRISTOPHER OLIVER
as 5:2023cv04235
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER OLIVER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEON v. BOLLINGER et al
as 2:2023cv04202
Plaintiff:
JAVIER ROMAN LEON
Defendant:
M.A. BOLLINGER, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, L.J. ODDO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rahman v. Leone
as 2:2023cv04110
Plaintiff:
Wali Rahman
Defendant:
P/O Daniel Leone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LUEVANO v. SECY OF HHS et al
as 2:2023cv04093
Plaintiff:
JAIME LUEVANO
Defendant:
SECY OF HHS, GOV. GREG ABBOTT, ATTY. GEN. KEN PAXON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COULSTON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2023cv04077
Plaintiff:
TROY COULSTON
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, KAREN ANSEL, CHARLES BENTHAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
POTTS v. NOTARIANNI et al
as 2:2023cv04182
Plaintiff:
GERARD POTTS and ANU HERU EL
Defendant:
JERRY NOTARIANNI, DEBI DOMENICK and CHRIS CHERMAK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
