US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania Civil Rights Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 8,605
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00322
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00314
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Cody, II v. Howell et al
as 1:2024cv00309
Plaintiff:
Jonathan L. Cody, II
Defendant:
Marc S. Howell and Harrisburg City Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Heidt v. Bowman et al
as 3:2024cv00313
Plaintiff:
Adrienne Heidt
Defendant:
Jen Bowman, Christopher Thompson and Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources Bureau of Forestry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00311
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00296
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Loving v. McIntyre et al
as 3:2024cv00281
Plaintiff:
Curtyjah Loving
Defendant:
Aidan McIntyre and Pittston Township
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00287
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00275
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Proctor v. AM Management Company
as 1:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
Anthony E. Proctor
Defendant:
AM Management Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
