U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania Civil Rights Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 9,108
Brockington v. Ebersol et al
as 3:2025cv00327
Plaintiff:
Tyriff Brockington
Defendant:
Dan Ebersol, Cathyann Hardaway and Domestic Relations
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Petrucci et al
as 3:2025cv00328
Plaintiff:
Marquis H. Johnson
Defendant:
James Petrucci, Zach and Andrew Layton Krowiak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv00335
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv00334
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Ripple, Administratix v. Matulewicz et al
as 4:2025cv00322
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Ann Ripple, Administratix
Defendant:
Anthony Matulewicz, Michael Piechuch, John E. Wetzel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv00321
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv00325
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cook v. Lackawanna County Prison et al
as 3:2025cv00314
Plaintiff:
Wallace Cook
Defendant:
Lackawanna County Prison and Mark Powell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv00317
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Adams v. Nolan et al
as 3:2025cv00302
Plaintiff:
Kailon Adams
Defendant:
Brian Nolan, Tulaney, Arayna Valdez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
