US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 700
Posey v. Harry et al
as 3:2024cv01191
Plaintiff:
Ajani Posey
Defendant:
Chris Oppman, Kathy Brittain and Dr. Laurel R. Harry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Janda v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2024cv01161
Defendant:
Ricardo Contreras, Lawrence Mahally, Laurel Harry and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Janda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Labrador v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2024cv01145
Defendant:
Fnu Badman, Federal Bureau (of) Prisons and Lt. A. Frye
Plaintiff:
Ringo Recto Labrador
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Beltran v. Pittsinger et al
as 3:2024cv01141
Defendant:
J. Rivello and C. Pittsinger
Plaintiff:
Jesus Manuel Beltran
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In Re: Matthew Alward
as 3:2024cv00983
Plaintiff:
Matthew Alward
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
ALWARD v. FCI OXFORD
as 3:2024cv00972
Plaintiff:
Matthew Alward
Defendant:
Fci Oxford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chi v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00928
Plaintiff:
Anson Chi
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Boose et al
as 1:2024cv00890
Plaintiff:
Raheem Johnson
Defendant:
Boose, CAPTAIN Baptiste, GRIEVANCE COUNSELOR Heist and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez v. Rivello et al
as 3:2024cv00870
Plaintiff:
Rene Sanchez
Defendant:
Correctional Foreman Clark, Superintendent Rivello and Correctional Industry Manager Northrop
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Briggz et al
as 1:2024cv00750
Plaintiff:
Dupree Williams
Defendant:
Gregory Briggz, C.O. Robinson, Savasia Caraballo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
