U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania Labor Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 170
Schaech v. IAAS Worldwide, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00724
Plaintiff:
Laura Schaech
Defendant:
IAAS Worldwide, LLC and Alan David Loeser, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Pierre et al v. Integrity Staffing Solution

as 1:2018cv00561
Plaintiff:
Edrice Pierre and Edwin Pierre
Defendant:
Integrity Staffing Solution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Taylor v. Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency/AES et al

as 1:2017cv02407
Plaintiff:
June K. Taylor
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency/AES, Brett W. Schreyer, Earl Hoch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clowney v. URS/AECOM, URS Federal Services et al
as 3:2017cv01761
Plaintiff:
Sandra Clowney
Defendant:
URS/AECOM, URS Federal Services and I.A.M. International Association of Machinists & Aerospace Workers, District 1 and Local 1717
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Acosta v. Susquehanna Nuclear LLC,

as 3:2017cv01752
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Susquehanna Nuclear LLC,
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651
Dershem v. FTS International Services, LLC
as 4:2017cv01559
Plaintiff:
Derek Dershem
Defendant:
FTS International Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Cromyak v. Conewago Pottsviflle et al

as 3:2017cv01076
Plaintiff:
Jon Ann Cromyak
Defendant:
Conewago Pottsviflle , Firetree, LTD and Charles Fritz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Slothour v. United Cerebral Palsy of Central PA
as 1:2017cv00883
Plaintiff:
Coty A. Slothour
Defendant:
United Cerebral Palsy of Central PA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
K.S. et al v. Mifflin County et al
as 1:2017cv00036
Plaintiff:
K.S. and J.H.
Defendant:
Mifflin County , Casey O'Dell , Kristen Matula and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Mabus et al

as 1:2016cv02157
Plaintiff:
George Smith
Defendant:
Raymond Mabus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.