US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania Labor Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 165
Kauffman v. Gettysburg Family Practice, Inc.
as 1:2015cv01614
Plaintiff:
Heather L. Kauffman
Defendant:
Gettysburg Family Practice, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Rabie v. Hanover Health Corporation
as 1:2015cv00905
Plaintiff:
Christine R. Rabie
Defendant:
Hanover Health Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611
Harner v. Lebanon City Police Department et al
as 1:2014cv01980
Plaintiff:
Andrew A. Harner
Defendant:
Lebanon City Police Department and The City of Lebanon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Honchen v. Loomis Armored US Inc.
as 1:2014cv01298
Plaintiff:
David Honchen
Defendant:
Loomis Armored US Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Graham Packaging Company, LP v. Ream et al
as 1:2014cv01224
Plaintiff:
Graham Packaging Company, LP
Defendant:
Stephen D. Ream and Amcor Rigid Plastics USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Barrouk v. PNC Bank, National Association
as 3:2014cv01102
Plaintiff:
Michael Barrouk
Defendant:
PNC Bank, National Association
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Bryant v. Wilkes-Barre Hospital Company, LLC
as 3:2014cv01062
Plaintiff:
Aneesha Bryant
Defendant:
Wilkes-Barre Hospital Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Viviano v. Hazleton Area School District et al
as 3:2014cv01018
Plaintiff:
Thomas Viviano
Defendant:
Hazleton Area School District and Francis Antonelli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
The Bon-Ton Stores, Inc. v. Pralle
as 1:2014cv00897
Plaintiff:
The Bon-Ton Stores, Inc.
Defendant:
Gary Pralle
Counterclaim_plaintiff:
Gary Pralle
Counterclaim_defendant:
The Bon-Ton Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Gregus v. Little Flower Manor of the Diocese of Scranton
as 3:2014cv00832
Plaintiff:
Gerardette Gregus
Defendant:
Little Flower Manor of the Diocese of Scranton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
