US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 247
STEWART-WILSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2017cv01335
Plaintiff:
DELANI J. STEWART-WILSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
STRAWBRIDGE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2017cv01091
Plaintiff:
JACK STRAWBRIDGE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
BLAIR v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2017cv00993
Plaintiff:
JACKLENE BLAIR
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
BALL v. 890 WEATHERWOOD LANE OPERATING COMPANY, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv00817
Plaintiff:
DORIS ANN BALL
Defendant:
890 WEATHERWOOD LANE OPERATING COMPANY, LLC and THE REHABILITATION & NURSING CENTER OF GREATER PITTSBURGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FOLEY v. WESTMORELAND REGIONAL HOSPITAL et al
as 2:2017cv00778
Plaintiff:
JACOB C. FOLEY
Defendant:
WESTMORELAND REGIONAL HOSPITAL , EXCELA HEALTH , WESTMORELAND OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BIELEWICZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2017cv00141
Plaintiff:
CONRAD C. BIELEWICZ
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402
BREI v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2017cv00121
Plaintiff:
SANDRA BREI
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PRIMARY HEALTH NETWORK, TIMOTHY FULLERTON, D.O. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
OLLIE v. LUBAHN, M.D. et al
as 1:2017cv00120
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH L. OLLIE
Defendant:
JOHN LUBAHN, M.D., JOHN DOE, HAMOT MEDICAL HOSPITAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARISTA et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2017cv00278
Plaintiff:
KENDRA ARISTA and RACHEL BORIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GUENTHER v. RAZ
as 2:2017cv00191
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY GUENTHER
Defendant:
YAEL RAZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
