Pennsylvania Social Security Cases

Supplemental Security Income Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 7,219
Sullivan v. Dudek
as 4:2025cv00423
Plaintiff: Terry Sullivan
Defendant: Leland Dudek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Dusendschine v. Dudek
as 1:2025cv00383
Plaintiff: Bryonna C. Dusendschine
Defendant: Leland Dudek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
VAZQUEZ PEREZ v. DUDEK
as 5:2025cv01083
Plaintiff: AWILDA VAZQUEZ PEREZ
Defendant: LELAND DUDEK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
AL BAZAZ v. DUDEK
as 2:2025cv01030
Plaintiff: MAHA MADHAT AL BAZAZ
Defendant: LELAND DUDEK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
BRONCHO-BILL v. COMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 2:2025cv00292
Plaintiff: GALE A. BRONCHO-BILL, II
Defendant: COMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 (g) Social Security (RSI)
Brzoska v. Acting Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2025cv00356
Plaintiff: Francis Brzoska
Defendant: Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
PARKER v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2025cv00998
Plaintiff: JOSEPHINE PARKER
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
PROKAY v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 5:2025cv00946
Plaintiff: LEANNA PROKAY
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Harper v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2025cv00818
Plaintiff: Kymberly Harper
Defendant: MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Harper v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2025cv00221
Plaintiff: Kymberly Harper
Defendant: MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?