Pennsylvania Social Security Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 7,074
ROBINSON v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv00361
Plaintiff:
CANDICE ROBINSON
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
TIMEPEACE et al v. COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 2:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
ALTERNA TIMEPEACE and TONYA BROWN
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER, OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Rhyne v. OMalley
as 1:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
James Rhyne
Defendant:
Martin J. OMalley and Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
WEST v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
VICTORIA J WEST
Defendant:
Commissioner of Soc MARTIN J O'MALLEY and MARTIN J O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Roecker v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Sarah Jane Roecker
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Manges (Keller) v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Kendra Manges (Keller)
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
SCHWEGEL v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
ERIC J SCHWEGEL
Defendant:
Commissioner of Soc MARTIN J O'MALLEY and MARTIN J O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Showers v. Kijakazi
as 3:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Karl M. Showers, III
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Coleman v. O'MALLEY
as 5:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
Shane Coleman and MR. SHANE COLEMAN
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY and COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
SEXTON v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH SEXTON
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI and MARTIN J. OMALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
