US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico
Cases 8,851 - 8,860 of 25,278
Roosevelt Cayman Asset Company II v. Vega-Perez et al
as 3:2015cv03040
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Cayman Asset Company II
Defendant:
Dennis Vega-Perez, Indira Ivelisse Cosme-Carrasquillo and Conjugal Partnership Vega-Cosme
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Guzman-Correa v. USA
as 3:2015cv03041
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Danny Guzman-Correa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Urban Financial Of America, LLC v. Correa et al
as 3:2015cv03043
Plaintiff:
Urban Financial of America, LLC
Defendant:
Jose Alberto Correa-Santiago, Mirtha Milagros Alvarado-Rivera, Conjugal Partnership Correa-Alvarado and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 191
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv03050
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Roosevelt Cayman Asset Company II v. Bonilla-Morales
as 3:2015cv03042
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Cayman Asset Company II
Defendant:
Arlene Bonilla-Morales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Roosevelt Cayman Asset Company v. Gonzalez-Santana
as 3:2015cv03044
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Cayman Asset Company
Defendant:
Josue Gabriel Gonzalez-Santana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roosevelt Cayman Asset Company v. Ventura-Reyes
as 3:2015cv03046
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Cayman Asset Company
Defendant:
Robert Edilio Ventura-Reyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Sanchez-Reyes v. Triple S Propiedad et al
as 3:2015cv03051
Plaintiff:
Pedro J Sanchez-Reyes
Defendant:
Triple S Propiedad, Real Legacy Assurance Co., New Step Rental, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pagan-Vega v. USA
as 3:2015cv03039
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Enrique Pagan-Vega
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Torres-Colon v. United States of America
as 3:2015cv03037
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Torres-Colon
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
