US District Court for the District of Rhode Island Other Statutes Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 2,405
Mayes et al v. AAK, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00444
Plaintiff:
Ursula Mayes, Vida Guerra, Sabella Shake and others
Defendant:
AAK, Inc. and Andrew Noyes
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
United States of America et al v. Care New England Health System et al
as 1:2018cv00435
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Froehlich v. Transportation Security Administration et al
as 1:2021cv00417
Plaintiff:
Matthew Froehlich
Defendant:
Transportation Security Administration and Rhode Island Airport Corporation
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Louth v. NFL Enterprises LLC
as 1:2021cv00405
Plaintiff:
Daniel Louth
Defendant:
NFL Enterprises LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2701
United States of America v. Phillips et al
as 1:2021cv00401
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Perry Phillips and Benjamin C. Foster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Dr. T. et al v. McKee
as 1:2021cv00387
Plaintiff:
Dr. T., Nurse L., HOSP CLERK M. and others
Defendant:
Nicole Scott Alexander, Daniel J. McKee and Nicole Alexander-Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC v. DeLory et al
as 1:2021cv00366
Plaintiff:
Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC
Defendant:
Kevin DeLory, Kenneth Phillips and Equity Prime Mortgage
Zhen v. TIAA Federal Savings Bank
as 1:2021cv00336
Plaintiff:
Pat Zhen
Defendant:
TIAA Federal Savings Bank
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Estate of Michael Tarasevich v. Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board, et al
as 1:2021cv00295
Defendant:
Estate of Michael Tarasevich by adn through his Executor Paul Tarasevich, Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board, RAVINDRA DEO, IN HER CAPACITY AS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board and others
Plaintiff:
Estate of Michael Tarasevich
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
