U.S. District Court for the District of South Dakota Social Security Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 452
Sharp Atherton v. Dudek
as 5:2025cv05039
Plaintiff:
Mia Dean Sharp Atherton
Defendant:
Lee Dudek
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bomford v. Dudek
as 5:2025cv05037
Plaintiff:
Denise Rose Bomford
Defendant:
Lee Dudek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Snyder v. Dudek
as 4:2025cv04062
Plaintiff:
Jason W Snyder
Defendant:
Leland Dudek
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Wright v. Dudek
as 5:2025cv05030
Plaintiff:
Melvin Wright
Defendant:
Leland Dudek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Meisenhoelder v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv04220
Plaintiff:
Christina Meisenhoelder
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Wadsworth v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv04160
Plaintiff:
Tim Bishop Wadsworth
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bock v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv05066
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Bridget A. Bock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Ventura v. O'Malley et al
as 4:2024cv04141
Interested Party:
Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Anthony James Ventura
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Lang v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv04137
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Toby L. Lang
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Pelton v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv05044
Plaintiff:
Lisa Anderson Pelton
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
